The Pope and the “African” President

It happened immediately. Almost as soon as Pope Benedict XVI announced he was leaving his position- Africans including many Ugandans took to social media and radio stations to laud his example as something their leaders should emulate. Roman Catholicism is a majority religion in many parts of Africa- and black by association to Latin America. In this way it is a religion of “underdevelopment” or of the “underdeveloped”.

urlThus the decision of the revered Pope to make history at the Papacy with his resignation, a first in modern times, has a special reverberation.

His decision, brave and heroic will be treated as a legacy worth following in Africa and will form part of the view now of what African leaders should do- could do.

One is reminded of that picture of Venezuela’s ailing President Hugo Chavez and the Pope. Chavez despite his health won another election recently but could not attend his own inauguration due to ill health. Venezuela titters on uncertainty as his larger than life personality, in that majority Catholic country, becomes a focus of how power is transitioned.

It will probably end up untidy and many Venezuelans who light a candle for Chavez as they pray with the Pope- must wonder how different the two examples are. A President that fights on and refuses to leave the stage and the most conservative Pontiff in recent times who sees the merit in handing over his responsibility in order that his charge continues and is not distracted by his own more private tribulations.

In understanding the reaction of African state houses which like Uganda may have such national motto’s as “For God and My Country” and often pray for their leaders to be “guided” into sensible decisions- one must appreciate that resignation is an alien practice.

It is in some ways part of the old “theology” of rule, which is associated with something godly and therefore uninterrupted by man-made decisions. When this issue comes up resignation is spoken of as part of the toolkit of modern governance- that supports a higher moral duty for public officers.

285668_531582226887015_676150719_nSupporters of many leaders , exceptional in their prime- like to also think of their role as divine and construct a divinity around their personality. If the Pontiff was alive to this fact most Africans are only awakened by his “modern” approach to his responsibilities as a Pope.

Resignation is man-made, save for the Bishop of Rome, who by commission is guided by a higher power. True the church is over “2000” years old and some may well say its lessons even one as shocking as a Pope’s resignation may take another 2000 to learn- but many will now ask that their secular leaders turn a page even as they receive prayers from their supporters.

There is something else about resigning- it’s a sacrifice. It means relinquishing privilege and yes power. Many Africans may recognize their leaders claims of sacrificing for a greater cause. However they also see resignation or demand it as a cure for incompetence not to advance competence by way of guaranteeing continuity. So the Pope’s resignation is a prudent and competent act but many African leaders called to resign are facing such pressure because many view that their good days are behind them and worse- it’s unclear who will replace them.

There is another more political utility of resignation in the way that it bridges controversial transitions of power. Alongside term limits, impeachment and death in office, a resignation is one way to hand over power to a trusted lieutenant and successor to run the government ahead of their succession. The one country, which comes to mind, is Botswana where the current President Ian Kharma was handed power [as a Vice President] by his predecessor Festus Mogae.

Granted there is no adult suffrage for President in that country but the continuity amongst others has made Botswana a less volatile place than say Zimbabwe where Robert Gabriel Mugabe was raised a devout Catholic. A resignation by President Mugabe [seen at the funeral of the last Pope above]would be as shocking as Pope Benedict’s but hardly something that Zimbabweans can expect.

Raila says Ugandan security killed civilians in Kenya

KENYAN opposition leader Raila Odinga said on Tuesday that he had called President Yoweri Museveni to protest what he called the presence of Ugandan gunmen in the lakeside city of Kisumu, where riots erupted in the aftermath of a disputed presidential election. 

The gunmen “have killed quite a number of civilians in Kisumu”, Mr Odinga said during an interview on KFM’s Hot Seat show on Tuesday evening.

The opposition leader, who claims to have won the disputed  December 27 presidential election, said Kisumu residents had variously reported seeing armed men driven in vehicles with Ugandan registration numbers. But the men were dressed in civilian attire, the Orange Democratic Movement party leader said.

Mr Odinga revealed that President Museveni had denied knowledge of the Ugandan military’s presence in post-election Kenya.

“What happened is that there were vehicles with Ugandan registration numbers. They were seen in Kisumu and the occupants were wearing civilian clothes. They have been shooting and they have killed quite a number of civilians in Kisumu…” Mr Odinga said.

“But I had occasion to speak to President Yoweri Museveni who assured me that there are no Ugandan forces in the country, and I have reason to believe what he was saying.” 

It is possible that the suspected Ugandan gunmen could have been Kenyan police officers using vehicles from Uganda, he said without citing a possible motive.

At least 600 people were reportedly killed in post-election violence in Kenya. Mr Odinga himself says close to 1,000 Kenyans died in ethnic battles. Nyanza Province, Mr Odinga’s backyard, was seriously hit by the post-election violence. About 300 of the victims were residents of Kisumu, the province’s headquarters.

There has been suspicion, especially among the border communities, that Uganda may have played a silent role in events that led up to bloody turmoil following Mr Kibaki’s swearing-in ceremony on December 30. 

While campaigning in the border town of Busia last Saturday, Mr Museveni faced questions from a crowd attending a rally at Madibira Primary School in Busia, where he was campaigning for NRM parliamentary contestant Sarah Wasike.

Some members of the crowd interrupted Mr Museveni’s speech, asking to know whether he unduly influenced the Electoral Commission of Kenya into announcing President Kibaki as the winner.

But the President dismissed the allegations. “I did not make Kibaki the president. It was the chairman [of the] Kenya Electoral Commission that made him the president,” he said.

It appears Mr Museveni’s rush to congratulate Mr Kibaki upon his re-election, the first and only message to have come from an African leader, could have raised suspicion. Some analysts have condemned the message, saying it was reckless.

It was not possible to independently verify claims of the Ugandan military’s participation in post-election violence in Kenya. But a reliable source who was among the security personnel deployed in Nyanza Province, which takes in Kisumu, said a curious Kenyan army officer identified two Ugandans clad in the Kenya Police uniform.

The duo communicated in Luganda, the source claimed, a language not used in Kenya’s armed forces. After a brief interrogation, one of the two gunmen allegedly admitted that he was a Ugandan, before being whisked away by security.

An outspoken cleric based at the Katakwa Diocese in Kenya’s Busia District also suggested in an interview with Daily Monitor that Ugandan soldiers could have crossed into Kenya in the wake of post-election violence there.

Rev. Phillip Mwakio said last week that a convoy of six vehicles bearing Uganda government registration numbers were seen crossing the border into Kenya after the Kenya government had closed its side of the border.

“It was at around 8p.m. that these vehicles crossed,” the cleric said. “We were surprised that vehicles would be allowed to cross when the border was closed? It was unusual.”

Rev. Mwakio said the tinted four-wheel drive vehicles sped past the Busia border gates without the usual security checks and took the Busia-Kisumu road amidst heavy deployment of security.

But the Busia RDC, Ms Robina Nabanja, said the claims were baseless reports being touted by “prophets of doom” intent on souring relations between the two neighbours. The Coordinator of Uganda’s Intelligence Services, Gen. David Tinyefuza, described the claims as “rubbish” and an insult to both Kenya and Uganda.

“It is the opposition [who are propagating the claims],” Gen. Tinyefuza said yesterday. “They are trying to incite the Kenyan population against us.”

Another knowledgeable source said Ugandan troops deployed to Kotido and Moroto usually enter and pass through Kenya because of the bad roads in eastern Uganda, and that the movements have nothing to do with Kenyan affairs.

Relative calm has returned to Kenya after Mr Odinga called off massive protest rallies in preparation for talks with the government.  But Mr Kibaki’s formation of a new cabinet, announced before the start of the talks, has not been welcomed by Mr Odinga, who says he will not give up the presidential battle just yet.

Source Daily Monitor
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,793 other followers

%d bloggers like this: