Uganda-Sudan spur in Cairo over rebels

imgres-52When the summit of the O.I.C (Organization for Islamic Conference) met in Cairo recently it was to a spurring between Uganda and its long time enemy the Sudan. Accusations between the two countries are nothing unusual. For many years while the south of Sudan fought a brutal war of independence, Uganda supported its army, the Sudan People’s Liberation Army/Movement that now runs the new government of Southern Sudan. In turn the Khartoum offered sanctuary and then arms and training to the Lord’s Resistance Army still led by the Ugandan “war lord” Joseph Kony.

The diplomatic spurring between Uganda and Sudan is likely to escalate. Relations between the two Sudans are still problematic and there is violence scattered around the old battle lines of their borders.

However Khartoum likely treats Kampala has the surrogate parent of the breakaway south- behind Juba’s desire for a clean severance from the north. South Sudan is East African-looking. It’s applied to join the regional block where Uganda wields some influence. In reported filings with the African Union, Sudan says Uganda has a policy of regime change in Khartoum. It may well be true. The same guys still run the show there that have been opponents on the battlefield.

What transpired in Cairo (while the new protests in Tahrir were going on) was relayed by the Ugandan Prime Minister in some detail during the periodic “tweet-ups” he conducts at which journalists and other techies sit through a no-holds barred conversation with him and then tweet his responses.

According to Amama Mbabazi when the Sudan brought the accusations of support to the OIC it was meant to torpedo the chances of Uganda’s candidate for the OIC General Secretaryship. “ They meant to frustrate our candidate [Isaac Isanga Musumba]” he said. OIC has a rotational leadership and it was Africa’s turn however the Saudi authorities have been shuttling to capitals of countries with candidates in a bid to convince them to cede to Saudi leadership. Musumba had told me months ago that the Ugandans would accommodate the Saudi’s in return for “something else”. It turns out Uganda through Mr.Mbabazi proposed an amendment to the OIC rules to create a new position that of “Deputy Secretary General in charge of Africa”. “ I told the Council of Ministers where Sudan brought its accusations that we were not supporting any rebels. Instead it is the Sudan that is supporting the Lords Resistance Army in South Darfur” Amama said. It gets more interesting. According to the PM who must have been expecting some action by the Sudan, he then presented evidence [or offered to] of Sudan’s continuing support for Mr. Kony but in response his Sudanese counterpart instead complained that the claims Uganda was making were in the “wrong forum”. “ They did not deny that they were supporting Kony,” he said.

The trial on the hunt for Kony is not cold but lukewarm. Reading the current LRA crisis tracker suggests that the rebel group is lying low and far away. Numbers of its Ugandan forces are reducing. Given its location and strategy if the group remains sequestered in Sudan it will likely morph into something other than a Ugandan rebel group. This happened with the ADF, which effectively became more Congolese with time retaining just a number of its original Ugandan talent.  Which begs the question however what happens to Mr. Kony eventually?

LRA’s strengths have always been subject to the alliance making around it. While Sudan relies on the OIC as its primary diplomatic constituency its unlikely that save for extreme circumstances involving a full return to its policy of supporting rebels to destabilize the South that LRA can be in action like it used to. However change is coming very slowly to Khartoum that has to deal with the South as a government nowadays. It’s the same with Juba. A mending of fences with the past may really be in order to dispense with this policy of aggression.

If Musumba does become an OIC Secretary General in charge of Africa one wonders if this should not be a major part of Ugandan diplomacy- to move things forward beyond rebel coalitions and conflict. Uganda is presently undergoing a foreign policy review. We promise to comment on it fully here soon.

To review the rest of the tweetup see #AskthePM

Yoweri Museveni phones Congo’s Kabila over crisis in the east says Ugandan PM

President Yoweri Museveni and his Congolese counterpart Joseph Kabila are talking about the crisis in Eastern Congo according to the Ugandan Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi. This revelation was made by Mr. Mbabazi on Saturday afternoon at the second “tweetup” a techie “ask the prime minister” hang out which publishes a Q&A under the hash tag ” #AskthePM”.

I attended the tweetup for the second time around and led the questioning on foreign policy issues. The hour and half covered amongst others Uganda’s relations in the region. Mr. Mbabazi was spoke candidly about the challenges that had arisen from the current tensions in the Congo where Uganda keeps a wary eye on both the Allied Democratic Front and the Lords Resistance Army.

The border region also buttresses shared oil fields. I pressed him on a little discussed but hugely important joint exploration and production agreement that Mr. Museveni signed with the late Congolese leader Mobutu Ssese Seko in 1993. ” Our intention was to work together but things did not work out” he said about the agreement. In 2008, the same framework was revisited the last time real tensions arose over oil issues in the Albertine Graben. Mr. Mbabazi said Uganda’s petroleum program had advanced but that the Kampala administration was willing to work with Kinshasa on its program.

The current tensions in the Congo he said were unrelated to the 2005 International Court of Justice ruling in which Uganda was facing billions in damages. ” We are still talking and we need more time in my opinion” he said in response to a tweeted question about the “plunder of congo” that ended up before the court.

Mr. Mbabazi, a past minister for regional affairs, one time head of Uganda’s external security organisation who also held the portfolios of defense said he spoke with authority and experience having chaired the Lusaka Accords of the 90′s which negotiated an end to the Congo’s wars.

Mr. Mbabazi said Mr. Museveni had phoned and spoken to Kabila and that Uganda had taken the view that dialogue would be the way to resolve the tension created by the rebel outfit M23. “Uganda is totally impartial” he said. He added that in his view most Congolese wanted to remain in a united country when asked about the whiff of secession rumors associated with M23.  He also said Ugandan troop deployments at the border were cautionary and ruled out taking sides in the melee.

” We are not involved ( militarily)” he said adding that the situation in the Kivu’s was “localised”.

@AmamaMbabazi says, “We recognise the sovereign integrity of the Democratic Republic of the Congo”#AskthePM

On Uganda’s overall foreign policy however he said the country sought stability first and desired political integration. Uganda’s role in Congo has remained in the spotlight in the current tensions. The country holds the chair of the Great Lakes Conference on Peace and Security which has urged dialogue but deep suspicion remains against it. Uganda has an unofficial policy of backing Rwanda whenever the latter’s security is threatened however this is interpreted which adds to the baggage the two countries have with their giant neighbor. According to the Prime Minister aside from a serious refugee problem the tensions in Congo were affecting regional trade. I do not have the half year numbers yet but promise to publish them when I get them.

Uganda’s “foreign policy” is not a common subject in public debate despite the country’s history of “participation” in regional conflicts both at the board room and in the battle field. Its worth debating however. Over to you.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,787 other followers

%d bloggers like this: